The Rubber Foundation: established sixty years ago. In the first twenty years of its existence known all over the world. Then slowly disappearing from the limelight.
Fortunately surviving in the early seventies, searching for new goals, getting a new reason for its existence in the course of the eigthies by supporting rubber research in
So as not to take the risk of the "Rubber Foundation" only being known for its present day activities, I would like to explain why the foundation was established and what the vari-ous boards of the foundation made of it. It all had to do with the natural rubber production in the Netherlands Indies, nowadays
As from 1922 the
Up until World War II the Rubber Foundation developed rapidly. Research results were published in the journal "Rubber", the "Mededelingen van de Rubber-Stichting" and other technical journals, and numerous lectures and courses contributed to the promotion of the use of natural rubber.
As from 1949 the promotional activities were extended throughout
Important topics in research at that time were the processing and application of foam and rubber/tarmac-mixtures. With respect to the latter road-building experiments were started in the
Furthermore new developments of the use of rubber in agriculture and industries were promoted through training activities.
Much time was spent in building exhibits at fairs in the
Logically World War II made contacts with
At the top of the activities in
A reshuffle of the board took place. TNO and the Royal Tropical Institute each got two seats, the other four seats remained unchanged at R.C.M.A., Crone, Deli Universal and HVA (Handels Vereeniging Amsterdam).
Due to the excellent chairmanship of Ir A.L.W. Seyffardt during three years, the Rubber Foundation survived all claims on its capital, sold its buildings in
During seventeen years as from 1971, Mr H. von Saher, director of H.G.Th. Crone at
Thus we reached the fifty years jubilee in 1986. We came together in the small auditorium of the Royal Tropical Institute in
Mr Von Saher, in his opening speech, remarked that the rubber producers still did not have a strong organization to defend their interests. After fifty years there was still scope for a rubber foundation with exactly the same goal: to promote the use of natural rubber. If there would be any doubt of our reason of existence, continuation for the time being seemed justified.
Assistance in rubber research in
Guest-speakers were asked to give their opinion about a future outlook. Prof Dr Ir Struik in particular stipulated the short term problems in improving the quality and consistency of NR, the introduction of specifications in view of the use of NR, and the enlarged possibilities of chemical modifications. For the long term situation, up to fifty years, he advised a more profound production-efficiency in the production countries, so that NR would keep up its unique qualities versus synthetic rubber.
Mr Niehorster explained the lack of reality in forecasts on the use of NR. Economy always had a great influence on the ups and downs of rubber. But negative effects were usually soon over and new heights were reached. Mr Niehorster predicted an impressive future for NR and an important role for the Rubber Foundation in
As from 1985 the board of the Rubber Foundation enjoyed the results obtained from its funding of the research activities at the rubber research station in
In the meantime support was also extended to the rubber research station for estate crops at Sungei Putih, near
In 1991 suddenly the collaboration came to a halt.
After a few years it was clear that the old way of collaborating with
In November 1992 Ing W.J. Aben of TNO, nowadays member of the board, and Ir S. de Meij, formerly staff-member at the Rubber Foundation laboratories and Vredestein and already for many years board member appointed by the board of TNO, presented their proposal "Continuation of the Activities of the Rubber Foundation for the Improvement of the Use of Natural Rubber".
The two experts visited a number of companies to make an inventory of the need for answers to questions about NR. They came to interesting conclusions.
Obvious was the discrepancy between the information about SR and NR. For SR every technologist knows were to find the specialist of the producer. For NR the only source of information is the rubbertrader. The producer of NR is too far away, and there are too many steps in between. Accompanying test-certificates usually donít help very much, as they only describe the rubber as it is on leaving the country of origin. No doubt you are familiar with this problem. This, together with the inherent lack of consistency of a product of nature may cause problems with, for instance, process automation.
Whereas SR-producers usually find enough technical support and information, the NR-producers lack a source of information in the
Another serious problem, not only for natural rubber, is the disappearing knowledge when employees retire. To find new staff-members with sufficient knowledge of natural rubber and latex is very difficult, particularly for senior functions. We are most glad that the SORK takes care of such training and that we may welcome the recent graduates of the rubber courses in our midst.
To come back to the starting point, the above mentioned pro-blems were a sufficient reason for the interviewed manufactu-rers to react positively to the idea of an information center for NR. Mr Aben and Mr de Meij expected that such a center could revive part of the old activities of the Rubber Foundation, i.e. supply information both from present day information available at TNO and knowledge still available at the Rubber Foundation archives. If requested, the former foundation activity of NR-courses also might be restarted.
It still took another three years before all details were worked out to establish the "
The center began its activites on
The first year was considered positive by the board of the Rubber Foundation. Early next year the board will decide about the future of the center.
It is obvious that the Rubber Foundation considers the past ten years as a revival of its true activities. Presently the board consists of members from TNO, Crone, Deli Universal and RCMA. The members of the board are very satisfied with the present day results.

0 komentar:
Posting Komentar